During the heat of an election long before I was old enough to vote, my father was frustrated by the fact that a single issue was swaying the voters to choose one candidate over another. "Hell," he said, slapping his newspaper down like a flyswatter, "this guy is going to be in office for at least four years, maybe eight, and we're acting like there's only one problem that matters. This issue will hardly be on the radar 6 months from now and we'll wake up and realize we've got the wrong guy!"
The bigger point, of course is that that hot issues come and go. When you make an important decision about someone, you need to take the long view and ask "is this the kind of person who I feel confident about, who has the kind of character, experience and perspective necessary to do a good job beyond the immediate issues at hand?" The issues are a factor of course, but voting on those alone is short sighted.
So, what does this have to do with e-commerce? Plenty, especially if you're thinking about a platform search. Recently, in the middle of a very complex e-commerce solution search, a client and I were evaluating the options. I asked the team for feedback on what they'd seen so far. One team member immediately said, "I am not sure about company ABC. I liked them, but the platform didn't offer a couple of features out of the box like company XYZ's did." So I asked:
Which company had done the most research on your business? Answer: company ABC
Which company asked you the most questions during the call? Answer: company ABC
Which of the two companies would you prefer to do business with if the features were the same? Answer: company ABC
Which company would you choose? Certainly there are so many other things to consider. Track record, price, speed to market, installed client base, the list goes on. But, at the end of the day, it can be easy to get side tracked by a slick e-commerce feature, just like it can be easy to let the issue of the moment be the focus of your political decisions.
There will be another e-commerce feature that you want next month, and several more the year after that. And, not all of them will be necessary or even appropriate for your business. Unless you have a large and highly competent IT team in house (in which case you probably really do want just e-commerce software), you are choosing an e-commerce solution provider who will be your partner in building a successful business, and the decision will likely be one you live with for many years. Don't let the feature of the moment become the focus of your decision. Features change. Just like issues change. Thanks, Dad.

Great post Sally and I couldn't agree more with your view. So often evaluations myopically focus on a feature (or collection of features) and lose perspective what the decision is really about...choosing a partner for a long meaningful journey. Yes, software is critical, but so are the people, their orientation, track record of serving customers, ongoing client support for merchants and techies, etc.
The question that I'd love to hear asked in every technology eval is, Can you describe what our relationship will look like 3 months after the software goes live?
IMO that should be a critical evaluation criteria.
Cheers
Jamus
Posted by: Jamus Driscoll | February 19, 2010 at 10:33 AM
Sally - what a great post. It is so important sometimes to look at a selection through the long lens. So many times we all get caught up in the right here right now of it all, and loose focus on it being a partnership for many years. That is why it is so important to also do your due diligence on references, and make many calls to other retailers that were not provided on your "list."
Thank you for a great post
Cheers
Adam Forrest
Posted by: Adam Forrest | February 19, 2010 at 10:48 AM
Jamus and Adam, thanks for stopping by! I love the idea of asking both client and provider how they see the relationship working 3-6 months after the implementation. I also sometimes ask clients to run through a scenario like: Your site has been live for 6 months. You've decided you really need to change the way that a feature on the site works. What do you do? What do you expect your solution provider to do? How do you expect that this work will get done? Sometimes walking through the expectations helps everyone see if there's agreement on how the relationship will work.
Posted by: Sally | February 19, 2010 at 11:07 AM
My dad always said "The more features anything has the more likely it is to break down." I have found over the years that he was right. Simpler is better in the long run
Posted by: Gary Overton | February 22, 2010 at 08:49 PM