E-commerce History as Teacher: The Brands Have Changed, but the Lesson Lives On

I don't have a hoarding problem.  But when it comes to e-commerce, I admit I am a pack rat.  When I read a report or an article about selling online that hits the mark I tend to save it and refer to it multiple times over multiple years.  Yes, this industry moves fast and changes frequently, so sometimes dumpster diving through old files is good for little more than amusement (about a month ago I found a box full of mouse pads that e-commerce companies used to send me as "gifts" when I ordered online in the mid 90's....almost all of the companies have since flamed out).  But many times, I come across something that I'm really glad I kept. 

Earlier this week, I re-surfaced a Forrester report from (get this) 2000. I saved it because I was working at Eddie Bauer at the time and was unbelievably proud of this statement from the report:

"Style-obsessed retailers like Williams-Sonoma and Banana Republic will continue to jump into online sales with sites that deliver flash over substance, exciting and then disappointing potential customers.  Unable to resist force-fitting their offline branding campaigns into their Web boutiques, they will fall further and further behind retailers like Eddie Bauer that understand that the core of online branding is serving user needs"

Ok, so that was a long time ago.  Williams-Sonoma, Banana Republic and Eddie Bauerall now have great e-commere websites that are a true pleasure to shop and reflect and enhance their brands.  But it wasn't always that way.  And for a good many brands today, it's still not that way.  Top tier retailers and manufacturers frequently struggle with how to make the best of the e-commerce channel and strike the delicate balance between immersing visitors in the richness of the brand while still creating a focused shopping experience that results in a transaction.

Recently, I did an in-depth shopping audit across e-commerce sites at 15 brands (all recognizable names).   It became clear early in the audit that this issue of balance between brand building and a useful commerce experience is alive and kicking, a good 9 years after the Forrester article first hit my desk.  Only the names have changed.   Here's a quick summary of some of the most common mis-steps:

1. Long, slow, heavy flash intros (yes, they are still out there!) 

2. Links to my account, service , search and other critical functions are hidden in favor of gorgeous photography

3. Navigational categories that reflects the retailer's nomenclature instead of the customer's language (i.e. The Market Street Collection)

4. Search functionality that brings up null results for common terms like "suede shoes" or "hiking boots" (search was broken on just about all sites I visited!)

5. The ability to sort the category thumbnail page alphabetically by product name (who cares?) instead of basics like color, size, price. 

6. Avoidance of customer reviews and ratings due to fear of a negative review (see my previous post on this one!)

7. Customer service, return policies and shipping information buried deep on a "FAQ" page instead of surfaced at critical decision points in the shopping process.  Most service pages did not list call center hours or set expectation about when email inquiries would be answered.

8. Points of real value, like free shipping offers not surfaced until late in the shopping process instead of on a home or category page.

9. Product pages that "show" but don't "tell":  great photos but little or no copy that answers real consumer questions or highlights benefits.

 10.   Overuse of icons and symbols for technical features that are hard to decipher and de-code.

So, how does this happen? Obviously any one of the above situations does not reflect well on any brand.  Yet they occurred frequently across numerous e-commerce sites for top brands during my shops.  I think it happens for a number of reasons:

• Executives and employees at many companies rarely look past the home page of their e-commerce sites.  Approvals and creative reviews are limited to visual appeal and adherence to a style guide vs. the delivery of critical shopping functionality. 

• Agencies hired to lead or assist with site design are hired for their experience with the brand's other media or for their ability to grasp the brand's visual essence vs. their expertise in e-commerce interaction design.

• Brand managers and creative directors shy away from advocating helpful customer tools like reviews and sort/filter tools for fear of becoming to "sales" vs. "experience" focused.

• Brand terminology (The Market Street Collection, etc.) works for store signage and print media (and even in e-commerce promotional space), but fails as navigational
  nomenclature, something rarely thought about during product development.

• Many companies under-invest in copy writing and content development specifically focused on web user goals.

I think Forrester said it best back in 2000, but I'll say it again. Enhancing your brand's image online means paying attention to more than the visual integrity.  The nature of the e-commerce channel requires that we pay equal (at least) attention to the customer actions the site must deliver. Otherwise, the brand experience is eroded.

While many e-commerce sites have clearly figured this out and found the delicate balance between form and function, it's clear from my recent experience that as an industry, we're still seeking guidance and answers in this critical area.   Good thing I'm a pack rat. But I don't have a hoarding problem! (Anyone want to buy a sock puppet mouse pad?)

 

Comments

[jerseys]

How did they get there?